ABSTRACT
Background The debate on vaccination strategies has been periodically involving researchers, policymakers, and also the population. Interest waves have occurred both after a revival of childhood infectious diseases in 2016-2017, due to low vaccine coverages, and during the recent Coronavirus outbreak. This study aimed at overviewing vaccination strategies (and corresponding vaccine coverages) for childhood vaccinations and SARS-CoV-2. Methods Measles was chosen as a childhood vaccination indicator. Policy data were retrieved from health institutions (either European or national/regional) and, for COVID-19, also from press agencies and newspaper websites. Vaccine coverage data were retrieved from the World Bank, World Health Organisation, and UNICEF databases (for childhood vaccines), and from the “Our World in Data” platform for SARS-CoV-2. A qualitative comparison was performed between the two contexts. Results Unlike childhood vaccinations, few countries (and only Austria in Europe) imposed generalised COVID-19 mandates, most countries preferring targeted mandates for higher-risk groups. Many countries confirmed their traditional voluntary vaccination approach also for COVID-19, while countries historically relying on compulsory vaccination strategies, such as Slovenia and Hungary, surprisingly opted for voluntary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, with unsatisfactory results. However, no tangible crude association was generally found between vaccination policies and achieved coverages, although factors such as cultural background, education, and religion appeared to influence the impact of vaccination policies. Conclusions The COVID-19 experience has enriched pre-existent vaccination strategy debates by adding interesting elements concerning attitudes toward vaccines in a novel context. Reading the available results in the frame of vaccine hesitancy determinants can help to understand the relationship between policies and actual coverages. Key messages Few countries have imposed generalised mandates for COVID-19, while many preferred targeted obligations for high-risk groups and some countries surprisingly opted for a voluntary approach. Accurately considering social and cultural determinants allows understanding the chance of success of vaccination strategies, ahead of fostering the right policymaking approach for each population.
ABSTRACT
Background The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent suicidality is still controversial. The present systematic review and meta analysis aim to summarise findings from emerging literature about prevalences of the main suicidal outcomes among children and adolescents under 19 years old, and to compare them with the pre-pandemic period. Methods Five databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and Web of Science) were systematically searched for studies published in English from January 1st, 2020 until November 3rd, 2021, reporting prevalence for suicidal ideation (SI), suicidal behaviors (SB) and suicide (S) in the general population aged <19 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Single-study prevalence data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. If studies reported prevalence estimates for both pre- and during-pandemic periods, prevalence ratio (PR) comparing the two periods has been computed and pooled. Results Sixteen observational studies were selected: 10 about SI, 9 about SB and 3 about S. During the pandemic, prevalence of SI among adolescents was 21% (95% CI 12-34%) while prevalence of SB was 3% (95% CI 1-10%). Comparing pre- and during- pandemic prevalences, a significant overall increase in SB was observed (PR 1.35;95% CI 1.06-1.72) while the prevalence rates of SI remained substantially steady (PR 0.95;95% CI 0.64-1.39). A narrative review on the population-based data on suicide rates suggested an escalating trend since Summer 2020, after an initial stability of the phenomenon. Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic SB showed a 35% increase and suicides rates escalated after a initial stability. School closures might be involved, representing an initial protective factor for suicidality, while after the reopenings we could have assisted to a suicide rebound, especially among the most vulnerable young people. Key messages • The topic of suicidality among young people is still affected by a cultural stigma that hampers the development of both academic research, early detection and preventive policies. • The increase in suicidal behaviors among youths after the COVID-19 outbreak highlights a major public health issue that requires adequate supporting policies to control and prevent this phenomenon.
ABSTRACT
Background Over the last decade, trends of suicidality among adolescents remain unclear. We conducted a cross-sectional study using surveillance data collected over the past 10 years in the Piedmont region, Italy, to explore temporal trends in suicidality among hospitalized adolescents. Methods This was a retrospective study over an 11-year period of time. The target cohort was adolescents aged 13-19 discharged from inpatient/day-hospital care with at least one suicidality-related ICD9-CM code (i.e., suicidal ideation-SI, suicidal risk-SR and suspected suicide-SS) between 2011 and 2021 in Piedmont (Northwestern Italy). Social-economic related data is available from Census 2011. Yearly incidence rates (IR) were calculated based on the overall hospitals’ catchment population and by sex. Poisson regression model was estimated to evaluate the trend over time and the association with sex, and a potential effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. A non-linear trend was allowed by modelling natural splines. Results We included 490 adolescents (median age: 15 years, IQR: 13-16), 380 girls and 110 boys, with ICD9-CM codes for SI (264;53.9%), SR (142;29%), SS (90;18.4%) at first discharge. Girls showed a higher risk of repeated inpatient care than boys (19.2% vs 7.3%, p < 0.01). Since 2013, yearly suicidality IRs started increasing linearly in boys (+1.7/100,000 per year, 95%CI: 0.7-2.8). Apparently, suicidality IRs increasing in girls were observed since 2011 (+5.8/100,000 per year, 95%CI 2.8-8.9) and were significantly higher than in boys (p < 0.001). Conclusions Suicidality among young inpatients increased in Piedmont during the last decade. Females seemed to be more affected than males. Further research is needed to better understand gender-related risk factors for suicidality. Key messages • There has been an increase in the number of adolescents reporting suicidal ideation in the last decade, especially in girls. • Intervention strategies are urgently needed to reverse a potentially alarming trend in suicidality among young people.